Subject: | What this package usefull for?... |
Summary: | Package rating comment |
Messages: | 2 |
Author: | Daniele Cruciani |
Date: | 2017-11-21 12:52:19 |
|
|
|
Daniele Cruciani rated this package as follows:
Utility: | Bad |
Consistency: | Bad |
Documentation: | Bad |
Examples: | Bad |
|
Daniele Cruciani - 2017-11-21 12:52:19
What this package usefull for? exactly, what is the difference with autoload_register and spl_autoload_register? Where is the advance on using this and not the lowlevel autoload already in php?
zinsou A.A.E.Moïse - 2017-11-21 14:21:57 - In reply to message 1 from Daniele Cruciani
this is not especially better than autoload register or spl function.The difference is just that it can also autoload the function when needed.I assume that some people are too weak to think a different way than what they learn so they just stay there like just some stupid goat and never want to do something new...This is just a concept that simulate the spl autoloading function and even if it isn't too advanced it is always better to know how to implement this yourself than stay there like a fish in its aquarium...Moreover the innovation come from experiments and failure and it is the reason we are here for...Anyway think you for your rating even if it is ugly i appreciate that you waste your precious time to do this.
Regards
|